Microsoft buys Nokia's devices for $7.9 billion

Written By Bejata Todd on Tuesday, September 3, 2013 | 4:30 PM

Nokia has sold its devices and services department to Microsoft. (Featured - Nokia CEO, Stephen Elop).

IT'S been rumoured for a long time and toady it finally happened.

MICROSOFT is buying Nokia Corp.'s devices and services business, and getting access to the company's patents, for a total of 5.44 billion euros (A$7.9 billion) in an effort to expand its share of the smartphone market, the companies announced late Monday.

Microsoft will pay 3.79 billion euros (A$5.5 billion) for the Nokia unit that makes mobile phones, including its line of Lumia smartphones that run Windows Phone software.

Microsoft is also paying 1.65 billion euros (A$2.5 billion) for a 10-year license to use Nokia's patents, with the option to extend it indefinitely.

"We are very excited about the proposal to bring the best mobile device efforts of Microsoft and Nokia together," Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said in a memo to employees. "We are receiving incredible talent, technology and IP (intellectual property)."

Microsoft said it is acquiring Nokia's Asha brand of low to mid-level smartphones and will license the Nokia brand for current Nokia mobile products.

"This element provides Microsoft with the opportunity to extend its service offerings to a far wider group around the world while allowing Nokia's mobile phones to serve as an on-ramp to Windows Phone," the companies said in a joint statement.

Redmond, Wash.-based Microsoft said it will draw from its overseas cash resources to fund the transaction. When the deal closes in early 2014, about 32,000 Nokia employees will transfer to Microsoft, the companies said.

Nokia, based in Espoo, Finland, said Stephen Elop will step down as president and CEO as the deal moves forward. 

The companies said he is expected to transfer to Microsoft, along with several Nokia vice presidents.

Nokia said Chairman Risto Siilasmaa will stay in his current role and assume the duties of interim CEO.

Nokia plans to hold a news conference in Finland tonight to discuss the deal.


Read more: http://www.news.com.au/technology/biztech/microsoft-buys-nokias-devices-for-79-billion/story-fn5lic6c-1226709828376#ixzz2dowJYASA
4:30 PM | 0 comments | Read More

Who should run Microsoft next?

Written By Bejata Todd on Friday, August 30, 2013 | 11:39 AM

Microsoft chairman and co-founder Bill Gates.
Microsoft chairman and co-founder Bill Gates. Photo: Bloomberg
Bill Gates. But since he won't, Farhad Manjoo has another guy in mind...
There's only one guy in the world who should be running Microsoft right now. Everyone knows his name (rhymes with Gill Bates), and everyone knows why he'd be perfect. Microsoft's problem isn't that it doesn't make money – it does, gobs of it, every quarter, like clockwork. (Microsoft's latest earnings report, issued in July, was universally described as "disastrous" because the company made only $US5 billion ($A5.6 billion) in profit.) Microsoft's problem is not that it doesn't make products that the world isn't using widely. Windows 8, its latest operating system, has been selling at a rate of 10 million licences a month. That's not as good as some of its earlier versions of Windows, but it's better than almost any other tech product in the world.
In other words, Microsoft's problem isn't the present. It's the future – and the path from here to there. And nobody is better suited to navigating that path than Bill Gates. Thirty years ago, Gates set forth an almost unimaginably bold goal for his tiny software company – "a computer on every desk and in every home." You can quibble with the way he achieved this – monopolistically, uncreatively – but you can't argue with the results. Windows crossed 1 billion users a few years ago, and now it has about 1.25 billion active users – more than any other computing platform anywhere. Gates managed this feat through force of will. Because he was the company's founder and – by all accounts – a hard-ass who sweated the details, Gates managed to stifle the in-fighting and bureaucracy that ordinarily consumes big firms (and that has been endemic at Microsoft for at least a dozen years). Under Gates, everyone at Microsoft knew what his or her purpose was when they went into work every morning – and, miraculously, they achieved that mission.
LinkedIn CEO Jeff Weiner: Future Microsoft visionary?
LinkedIn CEO Jeff Weiner: Future Microsoft visionary? Photo: AFP
Now what? Microsoft won the big game, and then, as happens in this business, the game changed. For the last decade under Steve Ballmer, Microsoft has been ricocheting from one goal to another – from making music players to tablets to touchscreen mobile operating systems to search engines to cloud servers to video games. A couple of these initiatives succeeded commercially, and some of them have been critically acclaimed flops. (I'm a big fan of Windows Phone, but its market share is way behind that of Apple's iOS and Google's Android.) Overall, though, the company's actions have been scattershot. Microsoft hasn't advocated an overarching vision for the future, or any goal on the order of Gates' PC-on-every-desk plan. It's a deficit felt both by the people who work there and, more importantly, the potential customers it wants to attract. To the world, Microsoft has become a generic tech firm – a cold, anodyne name selling slightly interesting widgets based on innovations other people put out years before.
Bill Gates isn't coming back to Microsoft. He has said so a million times, and – given that he's now doing something much better for the world – it wouldn't be a net positive for humanity. So I'll waste just a single paragraph explaining why he'd be perfect. There are lots of bold thinkers in the tech industry who could outline a new, daring goal for Microsoft – say, that it should abandon Windows in favour of making a new cloud-based operating system that stores all your data online. But the firm's legendary inertia would stymie many of them. At Microsoft, Windows is inviolable. This is a company that slaps the Office and Windows brand on everything it does (even Microsoft's user interfaces that have no "windows", like the one on its phone, are called Windows), and where anything that might detract from these cash cows is killed before it's released. Given all the money they make, sticking with Windows and Office has long seemed a reasonable strategy, one that Gates himself has advocated throughout the company's history. (A business professor might say that Microsoft is trapped in the classic innovator's dilemma.) But this tension illustrates precisely why Gates would be so effective. Only he has the institutional authority to liberate Microsoft from the Windows/Office golden noose. Only he could outline some new plan for the firm and command the troops to get in line.
If Gates isn't going to do it, it now falls to him – as the most important member of Microsoft's board – to find the second-best person to head the company in the wake of Ballmer's announcement that he'll be stepping down as chief executive. He could choose one of the firm's insiders, such as Terry Myerson, who heads Microsoft's OS division, or Julie Larson-Green, who runs the hardware and games business. Suggestions for outsiders who could run Microsoft range from the inspired but unlikely – Facebook's Sheryl Sandberg – to the nuts: ousted Apple mobile software chief Scott Forstall.
Steve Ballmer: To step down as Microsoft CEO within a year.
Steve Ballmer: To step down as Microsoft CEO within a year. Photo: Bloomberg
My own favourite idea – first advocated by Sulia CEO Jonathan Glick – is Jeff Weiner, LinkedIn's CEO. Weiner has been a standout executive, pushing the business-oriented social network to routinely top analysts' financial expectations and, thus, helping its stock price soar. More importantly, though, Weiner has skilfully navigated LinkedIn around several obvious strategic hurdles – why use it when we have Facebook and Twitter? He's done so by focusing on the long term, even going so far as to schedule 90 minutes a day of doing "nothing" into his calendar in order to force himself to think. That's exactly the kind of vision Microsoft needs – and, if Gates comes out strongly in favour of this sort of CEO, he might even bring a grand new idea to fruition.
There are loads of problems in the tech world that no one else is solving. We're getting dozens of new sensor-based devices – activity trackers, digital bathroom scales, home thermostats, smart spectacles – and there's no good computing platform to connect all of them into a seamless experience. Everyone's personal media – photos, videos, music – is scattered across loads of devices and services, and it's still too hard to get everything in one place. Both at home and at work, securing your data from thieves or other calamities is still a huge hassle – and the world is waiting for the company to make security painless and easy. That's true of privacy, too.
Microsoft's next leader could choose to focus the company on fixing one of these problems, or he or she could pick something entirely different. But please, just choose something big. Microsoft is a huge untapped reservoir of money and talent. It could do great things, if it had a leader who gave it half a chance.

11:39 AM | 0 comments | Read More

Windows 8 Sales Disappoint in Shaky PC Market

Written By Bejata Todd on Monday, December 24, 2012 | 7:03 AM


Plenty of consumers already own PCs and seem content to make do with what they have.
By

BELLEVUE, Wash. — It used to be that a new version of the Windows operating system was enough to get people excited about buying a new computer, giving sales a nice pop.

Not this time. Windows 8, the latest edition of Microsoft’s software, failed to pack shoppers into a Microsoft store in a mall here last week, at a time when parking lots in the area were overflowing. The trickle of shopping bags leaving the store with merchandise was nothing like the steady stream at a bustling Apple store upstairs.

Claude Ballard was among the customers at the Microsoft store who tried out Surface, a new Microsoft-designed Windows tablet. Mr. Ballard, who described himself as a “semiretired” computer systems manager for a real estate firm, said he was intrigued by the eye-catching design of Windows 8 — but not enough to scrimp to buy a new computer this year.

“It’s economics, really,” he said. “It’s going to be a better year for my mechanic than it is for me.”

Weak PC sales this holiday season suggest that the struggles of Microsoft and other companies that depend heavily on the computer business will not abate soon. Plenty of consumers already own PCs and seem content to make do with what they have, especially in a shaky economy in which less expensive mobile devices are bidding for a share of their wallets.

While there are also many tablets running Microsoft’s new, touch-friendly Windows, they have so far failed to emerge from the shadow of competing products from Apple and Amazon and other devices that are being snapped up by holiday shoppers.

Emmanuel Fromont, president of the Americas division of Acer, the world’s No. 4 PC maker, said sales of the company’s Windows 8 PCs had been lower than expected. He said one factor was the system’s unfamiliar design, which appeared to be making consumers cautious.

“There was not a huge spark in the market,” Mr. Fromont said. “It’s a slow start, there’s no question.”

The clearest evidence of Windows 8’s disappointing introduction comes from the research firm NPD, which estimates that sales of Windows machines have actually dropped from a year ago.

According to NPD, stores in the United States sold 13 percent fewer Windows devices from late October, when Windows 8 made its debut, through the first week in December, than in the same period last year.

Those figures do not include sales in Microsoft’s own stores, which were the only place to buy a Surface tablet during that period, but because the stores are scarce, analysts believe it is unlikely they made a big difference.

“I think everybody would have hoped for a better start,” said Stephen Baker, an analyst at NPD. “The thing is, this market is not the same market that Windows 7 or Vista or even XP launched into.”

Those earlier versions of Windows all came out during periods when the PC’s status as the center of computing seemed far more secure. In the intervening years, smartphones and tablets have become much more serious rivals for a share of consumer spending on technology. Sales of PCs have been declining for much of the year.

While most people are not getting rid of their PCs altogether in favor of mobile devices, analysts believe they are postponing purchases of new ones.

“What you’re seeing is not a retirement of PCs, but a push-out in the replacement cycle,” said A. M. Sacconaghi, an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein. “If people used to buy PCs every four years and are now buying them every five years, that could lower PC sales by 20 percent over time. That’s substantial.”

Mr. Sacconaghi predicted that global PC shipments would be down 3 percent in 2012.

The shift in spending to tablets is one reason that Windows 8 is so critical for Microsoft’s future. The company overhauled its operating system with a radically different, tile-based interface that is easier to navigate on touch-screen devices. Microsoft intends the software to be flexible enough that it can still be used on conventional laptops and desktops, including newer models with touch screens.

But the changes have disappointed a lot of reviewers and interface design experts, who have focused in particular on the potentially confusing coexistence of the new tile interface alongside the old desktop one.

Mr. Fromont of Acer said he thought there would be more excitement around PCs when more of the devices on store shelves had touch screens. Only 15 percent of Acer’s current Windows 8 products in North America have touch screens, he said.

Mark Martin, a spokesman for Microsoft, declined to comment, referring to past statements by Microsoft executives arguing that because Windows 8 is such a big shift, its rollout cannot be fairly judged over one shopping season.

The company says it sold 40 million copies of Windows 8 during its first month on the market, a figure that includes upgrade discs sold to consumers and copies installed on new machines by PC makers.

Apart from Acer, PC manufacturers showed little interest in discussing holiday sales of their products. Representatives for other big PC makers, including Lenovo, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Asus and Toshiba, either declined to comment on sales or did not respond to requests for comment.

Bill Calder, a spokesman for Intel, which provides the microprocessors at the heart of most PCs, did not dispute that PC sales had been slower than hoped for this holiday season, but he predicted that new
Windows 8 devices coming out next year would change that. “We’re excited about the prospects,” Mr. Calder said.

Big retailers of PCs were also mostly silent on their holiday sales. Jeff Haydock, a spokesman for Best Buy, said Windows 8’s effect on PC sales had “met our expectations.” Abt Electronics, a Chicago-based retailer, painted a more positive picture, estimating that unit sales of computers were up 13 percent so far this year.

Amazon’s list of its 100 best-selling electronics products offers a telling overview of the must-have devices for this holiday season: tablets like Amazon’s Kindle Fire HD and Apple’s iPad. On Friday afternoon there were just five computers on the list, all laptops, including two from Apple that cost more than $1,000. Only one laptop on the list came with Windows 8 as an option, while another ran Windows 7.

Brendan Barnicle, an analyst at Pacific Crest Securities, said tablets were sapping the growth of laptops, which represent the biggest chunk of computer sales. “Tablets are doing to the laptop market what laptops did to the desktop market,” he said. “They’re not going away.”

At a cavernous Best Buy store in Tukwila, Wash., last week, displays of mobile devices like the Kindle Fire HD and the iPad were much more crowded than the displays of Windows 8 devices arrayed around a much bigger section of the store. Hunched over a Windows 8 laptop was Jeff Lindstrom, a resource specialist at a Y.M.C.A. in Seattle, who said he needed to buy a computer that day for a youth program.

He didn’t care for the design of Windows 8 himself, though, and said he had no plans to replace his own six-year-old laptop. “I’m not impressed,” Mr. Lindstrom said. “It’s such a different direction than what I’m used to.”
7:03 AM | 0 comments | Read More

Hands on with Microsoft's Surface tablet

Written By Bejata Todd on Tuesday, June 19, 2012 | 11:40 PM

LOS ANGELES (CNNMoney) -- Microsoft on Monday unveiled one of the most imaginative and intelligently designed PCs the world has ever seen. Or: Microsoft unveiled yet another iPad copycat, only with fewer apps and a lower screen resolution.
Which one is it? It's impossible to know. That's because it's not clear yet what Surface, Microsoft's self-designed tablet PC, truly wants to be.

On one hand, it's a PC with extraordinary hardware. Microsoft (MSFT, Fortune 500) didn't allow the press much time with the device -- those at the company's launch event were given just a few minutes to pick it up, toy around with it, and flip through some of the screens. But from my short time with the device, it's clear that this is a very thoughtfully constructed product.

Microsoft's team spent years perfecting the top-secret device, paying very close attention to details that only Apple (AAPL, Fortune 500) typically cares about.

The tablet weighs just a smidgen less than Apple's iPad and is slightly slimmer, but it feels much more rugged. The Surface's magnesium case is light but incredibly sturdy -- I felt like I could drop it off a table without causing much damage, but I didn't think Microsoft would take kindly to an attempt to find out.
 
The Surface comes with an on-board kickstand, which risks seeming like a gimmicky feature, particularly when Microsoft's engineers proudly demonstrated how it snaps closed to a noise that could be mistaken for a tiny car's door slamming shut. But paired with the tablet's best feature, it actually serves an important purpose.

The Surface's 3-millimeter-thick cover doubles as an impossibly thin keyboard and touchpad mouse. With the kickstand in place and the cover lying flat on a table, the Surface becomes the world's thinnest laptop.

Microsoft wouldn't let reporters type on the keyboard when it was attached to the tablet with its magnetic connectors -- which are clearly modeled after the iPad's cover -- but it's safe to say the very, very slightly raised keys will take some getting used to. There's almost no way to feel where to place your hands without looking.

Yet Microsoft claims that the keyboard's software is sophisticated enough to allow touch typers to rest their fingers on the home keys, and it says the Surface will know the difference between a keystroke and a resting finger. That's not possible when typing on glass, the current standard for mobile device touchscreens.

For those who like a keyboard's mechanical feel, Microsoft is also releasing a slightly thicker cover with buttons that can be pressed.

Some of the Surface's smaller features illustrate just how much thought Microsoft's team put into its design. The kickstand leans the Surface back 22 degrees, which Microsoft says is the perfect camera angle for video chatting. The screen tapers back a bit at the edges, giving the Surface an elegant look. And the keyboard function shuts off when the cover is folded back. Smart.

The crucial question is going to be how Windows RT, the operating system that will run Microsoft's the less expensive ARM-based Surface tablets, stacks up. Those Surfaces are the ones Microsoft that says will be priced competitively with the iPad, which has a entry-level price tag of $499.

Those devices won't offer the full Windows experience. They will run on ARM (ARM) chips, the power-sipping microprocessors that are in 95% of the world's smartphones and tablets, which means they will not be compatible with any software that runs on Windows 7 (or earlier) desktops except for Microsoft Office.

If your Surface tablet doesn't double as your PC, then you've got a first-generation device that has fewer apps than the iPad, no Siri and no Retina Display.

There will eventually be Surface tablets that run the full Windows 8 operating system, which supports all desktop software, but those devices will cost around $1,000. At that point, do you just go for an ultrabook? Or spend a little more for a professional laptop?

Surface is a remarkable accomplishment for Microsoft. But a crucial question remains: Is it an iPad competitor or a PC?

11:40 PM | 0 comments | Read More

Microsoft Surface Tablet Aims To Outflank Apple At Work And At Play 3

All the clues point towards Microsoft announcing a tablet today. But what kind of tablet? Will it be for media consumption, like the Kindle Fire. Will it be an all-in-one iPad killer? Will it be a desperate attempt to get Windows 8, RT or Phone 7 on a tablet. Or will it be, in the words of Eric Franklin, tablet reviewer for CNET, “a trojan horse for SmartGlass”?

Franklin’s idea seems to most plausible to me, but I would broaden the reach of SmartGlass a bit. Microsoft announced SmartGlass just last week at their E3 presentation as tablet software for companion tablet devices for their highly successful Xbox 360. As I wrote in yesterday’s post, SmartGlass and Apple’s AirPlay can be used to stream or mirror content to a television.

Interestingly, the two biggest use cases for large screen TVs are in the living room and in the office or conference room, and Microsoft’s two biggest customer bases are businesses through Windows and Office software, and gamers through their Xbox and Kinect platforms. Wouldn’t it make sense for Microsoft to launch a tablet that could satisfy those two markets?

With the combination of Barnes & Noble e-book content and Xbox Live’s ability to stream Netflix, Hulu, ESPN, HBO Go as well as a music and movie streaming service, a MS Tab could be a “good enough” media experience for gamers contemplating cutting the cord from their cable companies. The fact that the announcement is taking place in LA would support the entertainment aspect of the offering.

And, with Barnes & Noble’s presence in with textbook business, a well priced tablet that integrated well with B&N’s e-textbook service could help move Microsoft into the college market as well.

The business case is a bit sketchier except that the Office suite is now available as web apps through the Microsoft Office 365 plan. The ability to beam office docs onto a big screen would be a plus, especially if those documents can be shared and worked on collaboratively in real time, like a white board. Even more than for consumers, Skype integration here could be a real productivity boon.

Is Microsoft rushing to capitalize on Apple’s “non-announcement” last week about their own big-screen offerings? Certainly this bit of a slowdown in Apple’s pace gives some sort of Windows tablet a short window of opportunity to build market share from their existing customer bases. Tune into Forbes tomorrow afternoon at 3:30 p.m. PT to find out who the “surprise announcement” surprises most, Apple or Amazon.

original article: http://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonykosner/2012/06/18/will-the-microsoft-tablet-be-good-enough-for-cord-cutters-strong-enough-for-business/
11:34 PM | 0 comments | Read More

What Microsoft Can Learn From Android's Mistakes

Written By Bejata Todd on Monday, January 16, 2012 | 10:15 PM

By:  Eric Savitz, Forbes Staff

Andreas Bernstrom is CEO of Rebtel, the second-largest mobile voice over IP telephony company. 

Since the launch of the Google’s Android OS in 2007, the choice for the majority of smartphone users eager to get their hands on ‘the next best thing’ has rested between two high-profile competitors: Google and Apple.

But a familiar contender is looming in the shadows, and I believe its success has yet to be fully realized.
While Microsoft‘s Windows Phone 7 still lags far behind the user numbers boasted by Android and iPhone, the fight for smartphone supremacy is still in the early rounds. Driven by the positive reception of newly introduced Windows Phone 7.5., and a Windows 8 release slated for 2012, some firms, such as IDC, predict that Windows-based smartphones will account for 20 percent of the market by 2015.

While success of this magnitude is no guarantee, Microsoft has a golden opportunity if it can learn from some key mistakes made by Android:

Avoid Fragmentation

Google has yet to consolidate all three versions of its OS, leaving them dispersed in the marketplace with no real direction.

According to the latest Android OS distribution chart, 50 percent of devices are running Android 2.3 “Gingerbread”, while 35 percent are still  running Android 2.2 “Froyo”.  Android 2.1 “Eclair”, which came out almost two years ago, still has a substantial share of the market with 9.6 percent. This is a bi-product of Google’s “hands-off” approach, which ironically was made famous by Microsoft and the company’s strategy with Windows.

Further down the line, this will prove to be a huge blow to the Android ecosystem. The Android Market allows developers to target devices based on any OS, so right off the bat, some users are going to be unable to access certain apps because their devices lack the necessary software APIs.
 
Two notable examples that have fallen victim to this are Netflix and Hulu Plus, which are both services that appeal to large portions of the user base. When the apps were first introduced, they were only compatible with 5 devices. Even after several months on the Android Market, Hulu Plus remains accessible on only 11 devices. Netflix is supported on nearly 24, but that’s still only a fraction of the number of Android phones that are already in consumers’ hands.

If Microsoft wants to reach critical mass, it should avoid Android’s free-for-all strategy, and make a conscious effort to avoid fragmentation that leaves its users in the dark.
Microsoft has already demonstrated an effort to refrain from fragmentation. Almost every WP7 device was updated to Windows Phone 7.5 “Mango,” when it was released in May 2011.

Inconsistent user interfaces lead to unhappy developers (and users)

Not only has the Android OS been chopped into various different pieces, but these pieces all look different, as manufacturers have shipped their Android devices with custom interface themes. This has been detrimental to the overall Android user experience.

Despite cornering half the smartphone market, inconsistency in design is having an adverse effect on the speed in which software updates can be processed on Androids. As a result, frustration has poured in from developers who have had to juggle with variety of complex platforms and interfaces.

Google recently addressed this problem by introducing its new interface theme, Holo, which Google claims will appease frustrations provoked by its open interfaces.  Originally, Google provided no specific theme that manufacturers (or OEMs) were forced to include in their devices, making for an inconsistent flow of visual design principles across the Android App Market.

Holo won’t roll out until the launch of Android 4.0 (also known as Ice Cream Sandwich), but it’s a good start, as it allows for developers to create apps for the default Ice Cream Sandwich environment without having to lose sleep over an OEM’s custom skin destroying their designs.

Microsoft would be smart to follow a more consistent design approach than Google has demonstrated, allowing for easier and faster development and deployment, as well as a consistent user experience across the OS and third-party apps.

Pest Control

Malware attacks have plagued Android since inception.

Android’s bug infestation grew worse in 2011, with countless malware-plagued apps removed by Google throughout the year. Security company McAfee released a report last November stating that in Q3 2011, 

Android experienced a 37 percent increase in the number of apps of a malicious nature hiding out in its digital marketplace.

Microsoft was quick to make a move last December that capitalized on Android’s malware disaster by offering free Windows Phones to five Android users with the worst malware horror stories.

It was a smart PR move, but Microsoft will need to continue to set itself apart by enforcing an approval process similar to that of Apple’s for all new app submissions.

Having tighter control of malware issues should give Microsoft the ability to govern the user experience on a higher level, and (from a long term standpoint) reap the benefits of improved consumer confidence.

Take control of the manufacturer ecosystem and improve the customer experience

Android devices tend to feel sluggish and unresponsive compared to iOS devices. This is another example of how Google’s “hands-off” approach has come back to haunt them.

Google adopted Microsoft’s old strategy of providing an OS and letting handset makers and carriers do what they like with it. Microsoft spent the ’90s sending out its brainchildren into the ecosystem to thrive and grow in any available environment. But that was back when “environments” were limited.

Microsoft, in wisely reworking its mobile strategy, has borrowed a lot more from Apple. Its new approach is more restrictive, and handset makers must adhere to strict hardware specifications if they want to make devices that run Windows Phone 7. Unlike Android, which currently has hundreds of devices on the market, WP7’s restrictions for handset makers has kept its device count down to 20.

Commitment to a stellar user experience, especially as it relates to controls and responsiveness, are two variables that have contributed immensely to Apple’s success with the iPhone, and can potentially do the same for Windows.

As a company who can lay claim to some of the “smartest” innovations of the computer age, Microsoft has taken some unusually hard hits from the competition in recent years. But taking a page from Android’s mistake book may just turn out to be Microsoft’s recipe for smartphone success in 2012 and beyond.

--------------
Original article: http://www.forbes.com/sites/ciocentral/2012/01/15/what-microsoft-can-learn-from-androids-mistakes


 

10:15 PM | 0 comments | Read More

Who will win in IT in 2012?

Written By Bejata Todd on Tuesday, December 27, 2011 | 9:57 PM

December 16, 2011: 9:20 AM ET

A bigger portion of spending will go to mobile computing, social networking and analytics. That means a new lineup of companies could benefit next year.

FORTUNE -- Worldwide IT spending is expected to hit $1.8 trillion in 2012, according to research firm IDC. An increasing portion of those dollars will be spent on fast-growing technologies like mobile computing, social networking and analytics, which means a new lineup of companies could start to benefit in 2012.

While the traditional enterprise players (think Microsoft (MSFT), IBM (IBM)and Oracle (ORCL)) still rake in billions of dollars from IT departments, relative newcomers like Facebook, Amazon (AMZN) and Google (GOOG) plus smaller cloud-based companies are likely to snag a growing piece of the pie in 2012.

Take Amazon Web Services, which is expected to top $1 billion in cloud services revenue by end of next year. Google's enterprise business, meanwhile, is expected to follow within 18 months. "The battle for enterprise platform dominance is just getting underway with established players like IBM, Microsoft, and Oracle facing serious challenges from Amazon, Google, Salesforce.com (CRM), and VMware (VMW)," notes a recent report from IDC.

That's why traditional enterprise players are buying independent software-as-a-service vendors, which also stand to benefit from trends in IT spending in 2012. A handful of them -- like Workday, Taleo (TLEO) and Netsuite (N) -- are likely to get snapped up in the coming year. In the last few months there have already been several large-scale acquisitions in this space. Earlier this month, SAP announced it is buying cloud-based HR management software maker SuccessFactors (SFSF) for $3.4 billion, and last October Oracle acquired online customer service company RightNow Technologies (RNOW) for $1.5 billion. This trend of large enterprise players buying their way into the cloud will likely continue in 2012. That's good news for smaller cloud-based software vendors, at least the ones that get acquired.

And then there's Facebook. The biggest name in social networking has been looking for a way to diversify its revenue stream. To that end, says IDC chief analyst Frank Gens, it could leverage its dominance with consumers into a larger role as an identity management platform for banks and online retailers. "Your Facebook identity could become your online identity everywhere," says Gens. "Facebook is one of the very few companies that has the reach to consumers to actually pull it off."

That's already happening to some extent with Facebook Connect, which allows users to log into websites using their Facebook identity. Linking profiles to payment sites and online retailers could enable users to not only sign in but also make purchases with one click using their Facebook credentials. And that could put Facebook on the path of becoming a bigger and more diversified player in the enterprise market.

But despite the potential for Facebook and other relative newcomers to snag a growing share, the majority of IT dollars will be spread among the usual suspects in 2012. "Even though the IT industry will follow along the same transformational path as it did in 2011, the events, the choices, and the stakes will be very different in 2012," chief analyst Gens said in a recent IDC report. "By the end of 2012, we should be able to see much more clearly which players have successfully positioned themselves in the 'lead pack' of the marathon-like race for industry leadership in the decade ahead."

---------
Original article: http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/12/16/who-will-win-in-it-in-2012/
9:57 PM | 0 comments | Read More

Is Microsoft In Or Out On Possible Yahoo Takeover Deal?

Written By Bejata Todd on Thursday, December 1, 2011 | 8:59 AM


In all the buzz and banter about the fate of beleaguered Yahoo (YHOO), the key question dominating all the speculation about a possible takover of the Internet pioneer is whether Microsoft (MSFT) is in or out of the picture.

But definitely, don’t count out Microsoft. You can bet that Microsoft will surely be in the picture, in some important way — if not completely in it as a sole bidder for Yahoo. On Oct. 23, 2011, I wrote in this space that either Microsoft or Alibaba Group Holding, a Chinese major Internet company,  will end up winning Yahoo. Today that proposition is still a valid one, although most Wall Street analysts now believe Microsoft won’t go hog and try to take all of Yahoo in the way it tried to do in 2008, when it offered to buy it at $33 a share.

But many cooks have since come up to stir the pot, which has made the situation more complicated than it should be. On Nov. 30, a Bloomberg story speculated that Silver Lakes Partners and a group of investors have offered to buy some 10% to 15% of Yahoo at $16.50 a share. Another is Thomas H. Lee Partners, which is reported to be interested in buying the U.S. operations of Yahoo. And other interested parties want to link up instead with Yahoo’s partners in Asia, where Yahoo’s assets, specifically a 43% stake in China’s Alibaba and 35% in Yahoo Japan, are estimated by Evercore Partners to be worth a combined $14 billion, or $11 a share.

But lest investors get bewildered and confused by all the speculation and conjectures, there is but one thing to focus on: Yahoo shares are undervalued by most metrics that analysts use, closing today (Dec. 1, 2011) at $15.72 a share, down from its 52-week high of $18.84.

Forget all the wranglings about what Yahoo will opt for, or what its many suitors want to do or pay for its combined or partial assets. The thing to keep in mind is, Yahoo,  in spite of  management bunglings and ineptitude, including Yahoo co-founder Jerry Yang‘s mindless rejection of Microsoft’s offer when he was in charge, is one of the most attractive Internet plays these days.

One analyst who thinks so is Standard & Poor’s Scott Kessler, who rates Yahoo a “strong buy” with a 12-month price target of $20 a share. He believes there is, indeed, significant interest in some parts, or all of the company. “We not only see considerable value in Yahoo’s major investments in Asia-based businesses, but note stabilization in the display business, benefits from the Microsoft (ad-search) deal, and potential associated with properietary content/video,” says Kessler.

Ken Sena, analyst at Evercore Partners, says his estimates show that Yahoo can achieve a mid-$20s price, based on his valuation of Yahoo’s rich assets in Asia. Sena, who rates Yahoo as “overweight,” says the risk-reward ratio remains attractive despite the fact that a high level of deal expectation is already in the stock.

Even so, he believes that even without a takeover, Yahoo is still worth at least $18 a share based on its core assets and operations. But its value could climb to the mid-$20s if it did a “cash-rich split-off of its Asian assets,” assuming that 100% of the cash proceeds from the split are devoted to buying back shares, says Sena.

The idea of splitting off Yahoo’s Asian assets is gaining adherents on Wall Street. “We continue to believe that a cash-rich split off of the Asian assets is the solution to unlock shareholder value,” says Jordan Rohamn, analyst at investment firm Stifel Nicolaus, who rates the stock a buy with a price target of $18 based on a sum-of-the-parts valuation.

Alibaba’s CEO Jack Ma has indicated publicly that he has arranged the required financing to buy back Yahoo’s Asian assets — up to $20 billion. Alternatively, Jack Ma and his partners may just decide to consider a bid for all of Yahoo if they can’t buy the Yahoo’s Asian assets, says Rohan.

He notes that Yahoo is one of the most globally recognized names on the Web, and a leading Internet-based media company. So it makes great sense for Alibaba or Microsoft to seriously ponder the idea of grabbing Yahoo, while the opportunity of grabbing is good.     

Ken suggests that instead of management’s proposed “leveraged recapitalization,” Yahoo should do a cash-rich split-off for Yahoo’s Asian assets, assuming no takeover deals place soon.

Original post: www.forbes.com
8:59 AM | 0 comments | Read More

Facebook, Skype, and Microsoft's savvy investment

Written By Bejata Todd on Thursday, July 7, 2011 | 7:32 AM

July 6, 2011

Just after Microsoft Chief Executive Officer Steve Ballmer announced plans in May to buy Skype, he and Skype Chief Executive Officer Tony Bates had one more order of business.
"The day we announced, we definitely came to see Mark," Bates said, talking of Facebook Chief Executive

Mark Zuckerberg, at a press conference today announcing Facebook's plans to bake Skype's video conferencing technology into its social network. "It was for both of us, Steve and I, the most important strategic relationship."

As Google grows ever more powerful in techdom, and Microsoft's influence slips, the Redmond software giant is building closer and closer ties to Facebook. The Facebook-Skype deal today is more evidence that Microsoft and Facebook are in lockstep as they fight their mutual foe, Google. And it comes even while Microsoft awaits regulatory approval to conclude its Skype acquisition.

"We have a really good relationship with Microsoft, where we work with them on a lot of different stuff," Zuckerberg said at the press conference announcing the new video-conferencing feature. That stuff includes advertising, where Microsoft provides all the search advertising to Facebook. It used to provide display advertising, too, but Facebook took over that task last year.

Microsoft has been criticized for its many missteps on the Internet, ranging from leisurely upgrades of Internet Explorer to being slow to understand the importance of search. But its relationship with Facebook is something Ballmer & Co. got right. Microsoft cemented its bond with Facebook in 2007, when it bought a 1.6 percent stake in the company for $240 million. Today, if reported valuations of Facebook are to be believed--online privately held stock marketplace SharesPost currently has an implied value for the company at $82.4 billion--that 1.6 percent is worth $1.3 billion.

But the Microsoft-Facebook relationship isn't really about savvy investment, of course. It's about fighting off Google. Microsoft's Facebook deals, and you can include the new video chat feature from Skype, are all aimed squarely at the search king. And just as the Web search giant has changed the market dynamics to undermine Microsoft's power--helping establish the Web, not the PC desktop, as the heart of computing--so too is Facebook challenging Google. Its service, with 750 million users worldwide, is becoming something of an alternative Internet, a place where computer users spend huge chunks of time and never touch a Google service.

In May, Microsoft began including recommendations from Facebook friends into its Bing search engine, elevating results that receive a "like" from someone in the searcher's network. That way, when people search for a coffee shop in Los Angeles, for example, a java stop that won Facebook praise from their friends will rate higher in their search results, as long as they are logged in, than other nearby locations.

The Microsoft-Facebook deals are creating services that Google has yet to match. Google has tried to add social networking to search, creating its +1 button to shower favor on a news article, a company, or even a search result. But its network isn't the equal of Facebook. So clicking the +1 button doesn't have the same impact as clicking a Facebook "like."

The new video chat feature unveiled today offers the potential to extend Skype to an ever wider audience. Facebook users can connect their accounts with Skype. If they chose to, it opens another outlet for the video-conferencing service. Microsoft has already talked about baking Skype into a host of products, everything from its Outlook e-mail software to its Xbox video game console. The new deal could conceivably allow video chats from a Skype customer through a Facebook account on a PC to a TV set where an Xbox user, also connected by Skype, is online.

That's why Google continues to innovate too. Its Google+ social network, launched to a limited number of users last week, is a direct threat to Facebook, offering features unavailable from its established rival. Google+ Circles is a far more convenient way to sort friends and acquaintances and send updates to specific groups than Facebook's friend set-up. And Google+ Hangouts was first to video chat, and allows users to connect with up to nine of their contacts. The new Facebook video chat service only allows one-to-one calling.

There's little doubt the battle will continue with both sides ratcheting up the pressure with new services and features. Standing next to Bates at the press conference today, Zuckerberg made that perfectly clear.
"We're in the process of figuring out what we want to do next," Zuckerberg said.
7:32 AM | 0 comments | Read More

Facebook planning IPO on $100 billion valuation?

Written By Bejata Todd on Tuesday, June 14, 2011 | 8:00 AM

June 13, 2011

Facebook is likely planning an initial public offering for early next year, a new report claims.
According to a CNBC report, Facebook is eying a public offering of its shares in the first quarter of 2012.

CNBC, citing people "familiar with the matter," said that shares of the world's largest social network will be offered based on a valuation of more than $100 billion.

CNBC reports that Facebook might be pushed into filing for an IPO because of a clause in the 1934 Securities and Exchange Act that requires private companies to release quarterly financial data when they have 500 or more owners. CNBC's sources said Facebook could hit the 500-person investor mark sometime this year, and make its IPO intentions known before that.

If Facebook is valued at $100 billion, the company would become one of the biggest companies in the technology industry. Apple, the top company in the market, is currently valued at more than $300 billion.

Microsoft's market capitalization stands at nearly $203 billion, while Google is valued at $162 billion. At $100 billion, Facebook would be worth more than Cisco, Hewlett-Packard, Canon, and a slew of other firms.

The $100 billion valuation becomes all the more impressive when one considers how quickly Facebook would get there. In January, a report from The New York Times claimed the social network was raising $500 million from Goldman Sachs and Digital Sky Technologies on a valuation of $50 billion.

Speculation that the social network would file for an IPO first started in 2009 when it modified its stock structure to make a public filing easier. After deciding against an IPO, Facebook was once again the subject of rumors suggesting the company would go public this year. Not long after those rumors cropped up, a Bloomberg report claimed Facebook wasn't even considering the possibility of an IPO until 2012 at the earliest.

But recent successes by online companies on the stock market might have changed management's outlook on going public.

Last month, LinkedIn offered its shares on the New York Stock Exchange for $45. In its first day, the company's stock rose to a high of $122.70 before closing at $94.25--a 109 percent gain. That success was quickly followed by last month's IPO of Russian search engine Yandex. The company's shares started their first day of trading at $25, and ended up to $37.75.

Several companies are already trying to capitalize on the market's seeming desire to add hot Web brands to their portfolios. Last week, Pandora announced that it had upped its IPO price to $10 to $12 per share.

Earlier this month, daily-deals provider Groupon filed for an IPO of its own that's valued at $750 million.

Facebook declined to comment on CNBC's report.
8:00 AM | 0 comments | Read More